Paper Details

Name: Kandi Kamala
Country: India

Year: 2026
Volume: Volume-13, Issue-1 (January-June)
Page Number: 385-392
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20567570

The proposal for Simultaneous Elections, popularly known as "One Nation, One Election"
(ONOE), has emerged as a significant electoral reform debate in India. The concept
advocates conducting elections to the Lok Sabha and all State Legislative Assemblies
concurrently, replacing the current system of staggered elections. Proponents argue that simultaneous elections can reduce the financial burden of frequent elections, minimize disruptions caused by the Model Code of Conduct, enhance policy continuity, and improve administrative efficiency. Critics, however, contend that such a reform may undermine India's federal structure, diminish the importance of regional issues, and affect democratic representation by favoring national political narratives over state-specific concerns.This study examines the feasibility of simultaneous elections in India from governance and democratic perspectives. It analyzes the constitutional, legal, administrative, and political challenges associated with synchronizing electoral cycles across the country. The research also explores the potential impact of simultaneous elections on governance efficiency, public expenditure,
voter turnout, electoral participation, and accountability mechanisms. Particular attention is given to the implications for federalism, Centre–State relations, and the representation of diverse regional interests within India's multi-party democratic framework. The study employs a qualitative research methodology based on the analysis of constitutional provisions, reports of the Election Commission of India, Law Commission recommendations, parliamentary committee reports, policy documents, and scholarly literature. Comparative experiences from countries practicing synchronized elections are also examined to identify relevant lessons for India.